Conquest Designer University

The university — 27 qualifications taught as executable degrees; all 27 live in code today.

Faculty of General Studies · CDU-GEN-ETH-900 · MSc · v1.0.0

Ethics & Conduct Module

The parts of professional ethics and governance that are bright lines rather than judgement calls: the fee-dependency thresholds of the IESBA Code, key-audit-partner rotation and cooling-off, the EU 70% cap on non-audit fees, and the King IV composition of a governing body.

Lineage

  • Conquest Designer University, 2026 — authored from the brief, the IESBA Code and King IV; no prior institution is claimed

Final research project

Where conduct has a bright line: fees, tenure, non-audit services and board composition

Syllabus

  1. The conceptual framework: identify, evaluate and address threats; where the Code sets a bright line (IESBA Part 1, Section 120)
  2. Independence and fees: fee dependency on a client, disclosure, review and withdrawal (Section 410)
  3. Long association: time-on, cooling-off by role (Section 540); non-audit-fee caps (EU 537/2014 Art. 4(2))
  4. Governance: non-executive majority, independence, executive presence on the board (King IV Principle 7)

Reference

Fee dependency (PIE)
fees from the client > 15% of the firm’s total fees for two consecutive years: disclose to those charged with governance and arrange a pre-issuance review; for five consecutive years: cease to be auditor (IESBA s410)
Fee dependency (non-PIE)
> 30% for five consecutive years: disclose and arrange a review (IESBA s410)
Key audit partner (PIE)
time-on 7 years; cooling-off: engagement partner 5, EQR 3, other KAP 2 (IESBA s540)
EU non-audit fee cap
non-audit fees ≤ 70% of the average audit fee of the last three consecutive years (Art. 4(2))
King IV Principle 7
a majority of non-executive members, most of them independent; at least the CEO and the finance executive on the board

Units

Fee dependency on an audit client · Key audit partner rotation and cooling-off · EU cap on non-audit fees · Governing-body composition (King IV Principle 7)

Role when narrated: You are an ethics partner advising a firm or a board. Name the provision, apply the bright line to the facts, and separate what the Code requires from the judgement that remains with the professional.

Fee dependency on an audit client · fee_dependency

Try with the example

Given the share of the firm’s fees this client has paid each year, what does the IESBA Code require?

Reference: IESBA Code Section 410 (revised fee-related provisions, effective for periods beginning on or after 15 December 2022): PIE 15% for two / five consecutive years; non-PIE 30% for five consecutive years

Returns

threshold
0.15 (PIE) or 0.30 (non-PIE)
consecutiveYearsAbove
Years in a row, ending with the latest, above the threshold
action
none, disclose-and-pre-issuance-review, cease-after-fifth-year, or disclose-and-review

The example

{
  "publicInterestEntity": true,
  "feeShares": [
    0.12,
    0.16,
    0.17
  ]
}

Agents: POST /faculty/ethics--conduct-module/fee_dependency with JSON {pan, …inputs} and the x-402-payment header. Manifest.

Key audit partner rotation and cooling-off · partner_rotation

Try with the example

For this role on a PIE audit, must the partner rotate off now, and for how long must they stay off?

Reference: IESBA Code Section 540 (PIE audit clients): R540.5 time-on of 7 years; cooling-off R540.11 (engagement partner 5), R540.12 (EQR 3), R540.14 (other key audit partner 2)

Returns

mustRotate
Years served ≥ 7
yearsRemaining
Years left before the time-on limit
coolingOffYears
Consecutive years off once rotated

The example

{
  "role": "engagement_partner",
  "yearsServed": 6
}

Agents: POST /faculty/ethics--conduct-module/partner_rotation with JSON {pan, …inputs} and the x-402-payment header. Manifest.

EU cap on non-audit fees · non_audit_fee_cap

Try with the example

Do this year’s non-audit fees stay within 70% of the average audit fee of the last three years?

Reference: Regulation (EU) No 537/2014 Art. 4(2): where non-audit services are provided for three or more consecutive years, their fees are limited to 70% of the average audit fee of the last three consecutive years

Returns

averageAuditFee
Mean of the three years
cap
70% of the average
headroom
Cap − non-audit fees (negative: over the cap)
breach
Non-audit fees above the cap

The example

{
  "auditFeesLastThreeYears": [
    1200000,
    1250000,
    1300000
  ],
  "nonAuditFeesThisYear": 700000
}

Agents: POST /faculty/ethics--conduct-module/non_audit_fee_cap with JSON {pan, …inputs} and the x-402-payment header. Manifest.

Governing-body composition (King IV Principle 7) · board_independence

Example filled in — consult below

Does the board have a non-executive majority, mostly independent, with at least two executives?

Reference: King IV Report (2016) Principle 7, recommended practices: a majority of non-executive members, most of whom should be independent; the CEO and the executive responsible for finance as members

Returns

nonExecutiveMajority
Non-executives > half the board
independentMajorityOfNeds
Independents > half the non-executives
atLeastTwoExecutives
Executives ≥ 2
compliant
All three

The example

{
  "totalMembers": 12,
  "nonExecutiveMembers": 9,
  "independentNonExecutives": 6
}

Agents: POST /faculty/ethics--conduct-module/board_independence with JSON {pan, …inputs} and the x-402-payment header. Manifest.

Conquest Designer University · the exam is $1 USD · every vote is a citation · all addresses · agent card